Sudanese experts are calling for a redefinition of the term "dialogue" in the context of the country's ongoing national talks. According to Osman Mirghani, a writer for Al-Tayar, the traditional understanding of dialogue as a one-time meeting or exchange of ideas is insufficient. Instead, he argues that dialogue should be viewed as a continuous process of building consensus over time.
Mirghani's comments come as Sudan's transitional government seeks to revive stalled national dialogue talks. The goal is to bring together various stakeholders to discuss and agree on key issues affecting the country. However, previous attempts at dialogue have been hindered by disagreements and lack of trust among parties. Mirghani suggests that a new approach to dialogue is needed to overcome these challenges.
The proposed redefinition of dialogue involves a more nuanced understanding of the process. According to Mirghani, dialogue should be seen as a cumulative process that allows for agreement on some issues while keeping others under review. This approach would enable parties to implement agreed-upon measures while continuing to discuss and negotiate on outstanding issues.
Mirghani illustrates his point using a hypothetical scenario involving two parties with competing proposals. In this example, the parties agree on three issues from one side but reject the other three proposed by the second side. Under the traditional understanding of dialogue, this would lead to further divisions and accusations. However, under the new approach, the agreed-upon issues would be implemented while the others are put on hold for future discussion.
The new approach to dialogue also involves a shift in mindset, according to Mirghani. Rather than viewing disagreement as a zero-sum game, parties should see it as a natural part of the dialogue process. This would allow for more flexibility and creativity in finding solutions that work for all parties. By adopting this mindset, Sudan's national dialogue can become more productive and inclusive.
Mirghani's comments reflect a growing recognition of the need for a new approach to dialogue in Sudan. The country's transitional government has faced significant challenges in recent months, including protests, economic woes, and divisions within the ruling coalition. By redefining dialogue and adopting a more inclusive and flexible approach, Sudan's leaders may be able to build a more sustainable and equitable future for the country.
The success of Sudan's national dialogue will depend on the ability of its leaders to adopt a new mindset and approach. This will require a willingness to listen to diverse perspectives, compromise on key issues, and prioritize the needs of all Sudanese citizens. By working together and adopting a more nuanced understanding of dialogue, Sudan's leaders can build a brighter future for the country and its people.
Key points
- Redefining 'dialogue' as a continuous process of building consensus over time.
