The recent collective revocation of the State Trading Corporation's board of directors has sparked controversy, with former independent consumer representative Suttyhudeo Tengur speaking out. Tengur has revealed three specific cases where he claims to have opposed board decisions. These cases involve a shipment of Pakistani rice, an importation of Asian canned goods, and a tax dispute with the Mauritius Revenue Authority.
The first case concerns a shipment of rice from Pakistan that Tengur claims was blocked due to a lack of proper documentation. He states that he requested a due diligence audit and an independent laboratory analysis certificate, which were not provided. As a result, the shipment was allegedly blocked, with Tengur exercising his veto power in the process.
The second case involves a proposed importation of canned goods from an Asian country. Tengur claims that he opposed the move due to the absence of sanitary and quality certificates. According to him, the order was subsequently cancelled. Tengur's actions were guided by his duty to represent consumer interests.
The third and most striking case involves a 2019 tax dispute. The STC had paid over Rs 10 million in taxes for a shipment of poor-quality fuel that was re-exported. Six years later, the sum had not been recovered, and Tengur claims that the board was preparing to write off the amount. He opposed this move, arguing that the Mauritius Revenue Authority had not officially refused to refund the amount.
Tengur's revelations raise questions about the STC's decision-making processes and accountability. The institution's chairman, Suren Dayal, and other board members were recently revoked. The STC is now under pressure to clarify the facts surrounding Tengur's claims and provide answers to the public.
Tengur has defended his actions, stating that he remained on the board to fulfill his duty to represent consumers. He rejects any political motivations, citing his previous roles at the Mauritius Standards Bureau and the Mauritius Meat Authority. Tengur also notes that the revocation affected the entire board, including senior officials and the Permanent Secretary.
Tengur concluded by stating that he leaves the STC with his head held high. The controversy highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the management of state-owned enterprises like the STC. The institution's response to Tengur's claims will be crucial in resolving the matter and restoring public trust.
Key points
- Former STC board member Suttyhudeo Tengur has raised concerns over three disputed cases involving rice, canned goods, and a tax dispute with the Mauritius Revenue Authority.
- Tengur claims that he opposed board decisions due to lack of proper documentation and certification.
- The STC is under pressure to clarify the facts surrounding Tengur's claims and provide answers to the public.
