Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu has appeared in court, citing several flaws in the treason case against him. Lissu, chairman of the Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA) party, made the claims on September 28, 2026, during his final submissions before a panel of three judges led by Judge Dunstan Ndunguru. He alleged that the process of initiating investigations into the case was carried out by one person or a few individuals without involving some relevant authorities.
Lissu specifically mentioned Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) George Bagyemu, who serves as Deputy Head of Criminal Investigations, as the person who decided that the words in a video constituted the offense of treason. According to Lissu, the incident involved actions taken on April 8, 2025, four days after the video appeared. He claimed that Bagyemu opened a treason investigation file without involving some of his senior officers, including the Zone Police Commander (ZPC) and the Director of Criminal Investigations (DCI).
Lissu further claimed that Bagyemu only informed his superiors after the file was opened. He also alleged that Bagyemu did not seek legal advice before or after opening the file. Citing page 159 of the evidence record, Lissu said this was confirmed in Bagyemu's testimony. Additionally, Lissu stated that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) was not informed about the matter at the time.
Lissu pointed out that despite Bagyemu informing some leaders about his actions, none of them appeared in court to provide evidence on the matter. He also claimed that Bagyemu did not involve or provide information to other investigative authorities or government institutions regarding his actions. Lissu emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, arguing that the evidence presented in court has not met the required legal standard.
The case against Lissu relates to a video that appeared to contain inflammatory remarks. Lissu's lawyer argued that the prosecution's case is flawed due to procedural irregularities. The judge and other members of the panel listened attentively to Lissu's submissions. The court's decision on the matter is awaited.
Lissu's claims have raised questions about the legitimacy of the treason case against him. If the court rules in his favor, it could have implications for the case's outcome. The opposition leader's supporters have expressed hope that the court will consider Lissu's arguments.
The case has garnered significant attention in Tanzania's political landscape. Lissu's ordeal began after the video sparked controversy. The court's verdict will be closely watched by Tanzanians and international observers alike.
Key points
- Lissu claims ACP Bagyemu initiated treason investigation without involving senior officers.
- Lissu alleges Bagyemu did not seek legal advice before opening investigation file.
- Lissu argues that prosecution's evidence has not met required legal standard.
