The European Commission's strategy to optimize its real estate in Brussels has sparked internal controversy and judicial investigations. In April 2024, the Commission sold a portfolio of 23 buildings to a Belgian public company for 900 million euros, aiming to reduce operating expenses. However, documents reveal that the Commission continues to temporarily occupy 17 of these buildings, incurring an initial rental cost of 255 million euros.
The Commission's delayed relocation of several services has led to additional budget allocations of 24.59 million euros for 2027 and 25.62 million euros for 2028, as programmed by the Renew Europe group. This brings the total occupation cost of the former offices to over 305 million euros. The financial implications cast doubt on the net savings expected from the deal.
The European Court of Auditors has criticized the transaction, citing significant anomalies in the award procedure. The sole bidder submitted an offer before the official call for tenders was launched. Furthermore, the buyer's 80 million euro bank guarantee only covered a two-month period, whereas the original specifications required six months. The selection committee's composition also lacked hierarchical independence.
These administrative irregularities led to a judicial investigation, marked by searches conducted in February 2026 under the European Public Prosecutor's Office. The relocation of some staff to the North Station area has sparked strong opposition from employee representatives. The President of the Renew Europe group, Cristiano Sebastiani, has questioned European Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin about agent safety and the operation's actual profitability.
The union has requested formal assurance that the Commission's rental payments will not enable the buyer to fully amortize the purchase price at the expense of European taxpayers. The Commission's handling of the transaction has raised concerns about its commitment to transparency and prudent financial management.
The investigation into the real estate deal is ongoing, with the European Public Prosecutor's Office overseeing the proceedings. The Commission's actions have been criticized for lacking transparency, and there are concerns that the deal may not have been in the best interests of European taxpayers.
The controversy surrounding the Brussels real estate deal highlights the need for greater scrutiny of large-scale financial transactions involving European institutions. The outcome of the investigation will likely have implications for the Commission's future financial management and decision-making processes.
Key points
- The European Commission's 900 million euro Brussels real estate deal is under investigation due to procedural irregularities and potential financial losses.
- The deal has sparked controversy over the Commission's handling of the transaction and its commitment to transparency and prudent financial management.
- The investigation's outcome will likely impact the Commission's future financial management and decision-making processes.
Reporting sources
- Bruxelles : Opération immobilière controversée et sous enquête pour la Commission européenne · Le Quotidien de Nouakchott