The Alliance of Sahel States (AES), comprising Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, has brought to an end the myth of imperialist domination in Africa. For a long time, the concept of imperialist domination was viewed as a material reality, characterized by foreign military bases, economic dependence, and defense agreements. However, this perspective is considered insufficient, as it overlooks the psychological aspect of domination. According to philosopher Job Diarra, domination endures not only through force but also through the internalization of its legitimacy by the dominated.
The myth of imperialist domination in Africa was founded on three key elements: the indispensability myth, the invincibility myth, and the incapacity myth. The indispensability myth posits that external powers are necessary for the stability and security of African nations. The invincibility myth asserts that these powers are unchallengeable, while the incapacity myth claims that African nations are unable to govern themselves. These myths created a culture of dependency, where African nations would subcontract their security, monetary policy, and even their thinking to external powers.
The AES has challenged these myths by taking bold steps towards self-determination. By requesting the departure of foreign troops and assuming responsibility for their own security, the member states have demonstrated that security is not an imported product but rather a collective effort. This move is seen as a philosophical operation, aimed at restoring the dignity and self-worth of the Sahel nations. According to Diarra, this process is a manifestation of the concept of "reconciliation with effort," where nations strive to achieve their goals through their own endeavors.
The AES has also challenged the myth of invincibility by defying the notion that African nations cannot say "no" to external powers. By saying "no" to foreign domination and establishing a confederation on July 6, 2024, the AES has institutionalized its resistance. This move is seen as a critical step towards reclaiming the essence of African nations, as described by philosopher Karl Marx. The AES has effectively demonstrated that African nations can make their own history and shape their own destiny.
Furthermore, the AES has made significant strides in challenging the myth of incapacity. By establishing a joint force, a confederal investment bank, and a doctrine of food and educational sovereignty, the AES has shown that African nations can think and act for themselves. This new approach is seen as a manifestation of the "we" mentality, where Sahel nations work together as a single entity, rather than competing for external aid.
While some critics may point to the economic difficulties faced by the AES member states, supporters argue that the process of de-alienation is a work in progress, not a miracle. As Marx noted in his Manuscripts of 1844, exiting alienation requires real work and effort from the people. The AES represents a radical shift in the way African nations perceive themselves and their place in the world.
The implications of the AES's actions are far-reaching, with the potential to reshape the relationship between African nations and external powers. As one commentator noted, the AES marks the end of the FrancAfrique era and the beginning of a new era of sovereignty and self-determination for African nations. The AES's challenge to the myth of imperialist domination has opened up new possibilities for African nations to assert their independence and shape their own futures.
Key points
- The Alliance of Sahel States has challenged the myth of imperialist domination in Africa by asserting its independence and self-determination.
