A citizen of Togo, Ricardo Agouzou, has expressed concerns over a colloquium organized by the University of Lomé following a decision by the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (CEDEAO). In an open letter to Prof. Hounaké, Agouzou questioned the scientific value of the event and demanded that the financing and cost of the colloquium be made public.
Agouzou criticized Prof. Hounaké for defending the colloquium in the media without addressing the substance of the court's decision, particularly Article 23 of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections, and Governance. He argued that the absence of opposing views at the colloquium does not validate the theses presented and called for a genuine debate with diverse perspectives.
The citizen also questioned the timing and purpose of the colloquium, noting that it was organized after the court's decision and would not change its legal effects. He asked why significant resources were mobilized for an event that would not impact the court's ruling, adding that a colloquium is not a means of appeal or judicial review.
Agouzou challenged Prof. Hounaké's assertion that the CEDEAO court's decision is not binding, arguing that his interpretation is not the only legally acceptable one. He urged the professor to address the substance of the court's decision and the concerns it raises, rather than simply contesting its competence or invoking national sovereignty.
The citizen expressed concern that Prof. Hounaké's efforts to defend a political position using the prestige of the university may ultimately harm those he intends to defend. He suggested that it would be more productive for the professor to focus on managing the university and promoting academic excellence, rather than engaging in media debates.
Agouzou also questioned the motivations of intellectuals who only speak out when the government is in difficulty, suggesting that they should also address the daily struggles of the Togolese people, such as access to water and electricity. He implied that the colloquium was more about defending the government's interests than promoting scientific knowledge or public welfare.
The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over the CEDEAO court's decision and its implications for Togo's democracy and governance. The university's response to Agouzou's concerns and the funding of the colloquium remain to be seen.
Key points
- The citizen's letter questions the value and funding of a colloquium organized by the University of Lomé.
- The colloquium was held after a CEDEAO court decision on Togo's governance.
- The citizen challenges Prof. Hounaké's defense of the colloquium and its scientific validity.
