The Sudanese government has expressed its rejection of a statement by the US State Department regarding the legitimacy of any government in Sudan. The statement, released on Wednesday, said that the Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces, or their leaders, do not represent a legitimate constitutional government. The Sudanese Foreign Ministry stated that it maintains its national sovereignty and called on the US to engage positively with the Sudanese government.
The US statement has elicited mixed reactions from Sudanese and foreign parties. Cameron Hudson, a former National Security Council member, said the statement amounts to a declaration of policy aimed at regime change in Sudan. He attributed this stance to a series of diplomatic missteps, including sanctions related to chemical weapons and an arms embargo. Hudson expressed concern that this approach may escalate the situation, allowing the US to justify its policy.
The Sudanese government has affirmed its readiness to engage positively and responsibly with the US and other international partners. The Foreign Ministry emphasized that any peace initiative must respect Sudan's sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity. It also stressed the need to address the root causes of the conflict, including foreign interference. The government rejected equating the legitimate state institutions with the rebellion.
The US statement was welcomed by the National Umma Party. The party's statement said that the US position confirms the need to distinguish between dealing with the current power reality and granting political or constitutional legitimacy. The party called for a comprehensive and credible national political process to determine Sudan's future and system of government.
The Sudanese government has expressed its willingness to cooperate with international partners, including the African Union, the Arab League, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The government emphasized its commitment to achieving peace and stability based on respect for its sovereignty and the will of its people.
Mubarak Ardoul, a leader of the Democratic Bloc, urged caution and restraint in dealing with the US administration. He emphasized the need to keep channels of dialogue open and to manage differences calmly and directly. Ardoul stressed that Sudan's foreign relations should be based on mutual interests, respect, and direct dialogue.
The situation in Sudan remains complex, with ongoing conflict and efforts to achieve peace and stability. The Sudanese government faces challenges in navigating its relationships with international partners while maintaining its sovereignty and national interests. The US statement has added to the complexity of the situation, and it remains to be seen how the situation will evolve.
Key points
- The Sudanese government rejects the US statement on the legitimacy of any government in Sudan.
- The US statement has elicited mixed reactions from Sudanese and foreign parties.
- The Sudanese government affirms its readiness to engage positively and responsibly with the US and other international partners.
