The Durban High Court has granted an interim order restricting the March and March movement and its leaders from using violence to force businesses to close or obstructing roads through violent conduct. The order follows an urgent application by the Minister of Police and the KwaZulu-Natal provincial commissioner, who raised concerns about intelligence warning of an alleged plan to burn down the Refugee Reception Centre on Che Guevara Road. The applicants brought the case in their official capacities, relying on section 38(d) of the Constitution to act in the public interest and protect the rights to life, dignity, and freedom and security of the person.
The court issued a rule nisi calling on the movement, its leader Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, her husband Xolani Zuma, and other senior members to show cause on January 18, 2027, why a final order should not be granted interdicting them from instigating or encouraging assaults, intimidation, and threats against residents, traders, business owners, delivery drivers, and other road users. They must also show cause why they should not be permanently interdicted from looting, attacking Home Affairs premises, inciting violence, or intimidating groups of people, as well as performing acts or making statements likely to encourage violence against any person.
The interim order also places restrictions on what participants may carry or wear during marches and demonstrations. The respondents are interdicted and restrained from possessing any airgun, imitation firearm, wearing disguises, masks, or other items that obscure facial features and prevent identification. The order also prohibits them from wearing clothing resembling the uniforms of security forces, including those of the police and the South African National Defence Force.
The order takes immediate effect and will remain in force pending the return date in November. The respondents have been directed to file their answering affidavits by November 27, while the applicants must deliver their replying affidavits by January 11, 2027. In the meantime, the court ordered that the movement's marches may take place between 9am and 3pm, with the period between 3pm and 4pm set aside for participants to disperse.
Advocate Nalini Govender, representing the applicants, had argued that the demonstrators should not be on the streets during peak traffic hours. During submissions on the relief sought, the movement's advocate, Sandile Kuboni, objected to what he said was the applicants' portrayal of the movement and its leadership as violent. Kuboni argued that the police had not produced evidence demonstrating that the respondents were violent.
Outside court, Xolani Zuma told members of the movement that they would no longer be allowed to carry sticks during marches. The announcement was met with audible complaints from some members. The police presence was heavy as the March and March movement was at Durban court, which is housing the Durban Magistrates court and the high court.
The March and March movement's marches and protests have raised concerns among authorities and residents. The movement's activities have been closely monitored, and the court has taken steps to ensure that the rights of all parties are protected. The final outcome will be determined on January 18, 2027, when the court will consider the rule nisi and decide whether to grant a final order.
Key points
- The Durban High Court has imposed restrictions on the March and March movement, prohibiting them from using violence, carrying weapons, and wearing disguises during protests.
- The restrictions include a ban on possessing airguns, imitation firearms, and wearing clothing resembling security forces' uniforms.
- The court has set a return date of January 18, 2027, to consider a final order.
