An online panel discussion hosted by Radio Tamazuj has raised concerns about the constitutional and political implications of President Salva Kiir’s decision to dissolve South Sudan’s transitional government ahead of elections scheduled for December 22. The discussion brought together experts to examine the implications of the dissolution and the risks facing the country.
The panelists, including Dr. Remember Miamingi, Animu Amitai, and Kuel Aguer Kuel, warned that the concentration of executive power could deepen political instability and increase the risk of renewed conflict and fragmentation. They questioned the scope and timing of the ongoing inter-party dialogue in Juba, citing unclear parameters and potential biases towards political elites.
The speakers argued that elections should be conducted within a clear legal framework and raised concerns about restrictions on fundamental freedoms, including those linked to the National Security Act. They also highlighted financial and logistical challenges facing the National Elections Commission, including an estimated $225 million funding requirement, and questioned whether there was sufficient time to complete the electoral process before the December vote.
Voter registration had not begun as of September 22, and Dr. Miamingi raised concerns about presidential succession and the constitutional arrangements that would apply if the president is unable to continue in office. Kuel called for a review of the 2018 peace agreement and the constitutional framework governing the transition, particularly following the dissolution of the power-sharing government.
Animu Amitai said regional and continental organisations should play a stronger role in addressing South Sudan’s political crisis. She also criticised what she described as limited international pressure on the government, arguing that diplomatic statements should be backed by sustained engagement and, where appropriate, targeted measures.
The panel discussed the lack of clear accountability mechanisms under the caretaker administration and considered possible responses, including public-interest litigation and diplomatic measures. Kiir dissolved the transitional government, parliament, and state governments on September 22 and appointed a caretaker administration, under which he remains president during the electoral period until a newly elected president takes office.
The panelists emphasised that the credibility of the electoral process would depend on a clear legal framework, adequate preparations by electoral institutions, political participation, and the protection of civic and political freedoms. They stressed the need for a comprehensive approach to address the country's challenges and ensure a peaceful and credible electoral process.
Key points
- The dissolution of the transitional government has raised concerns about the concentration of executive power and its implications for South Sudan's stability.
- The panelists called for a clear legal framework, adequate preparations, and the protection of civic and political freedoms to ensure a credible electoral process.
- Regional and continental organisations are urged to play a stronger role in addressing South Sudan's political crisis.
