Nigerians Frustrated with Governance, Not Geography

A recent perspective piece argues that Nigerians' dissatisfaction with the current administration is not driven by regional hostility, but rather by frustration with governance. The author, Anthony Ada Abraham, notes that opposition to an incumbent administration has never been exclusive to any particular region in Nigeria. Both the South and the East have supported opposition movements against leaders from the North, just as Northerners have opposed leaders from the South.

Abraham cites the administration of Goodluck Jonathan as an example, where many people who now portray political opposition as an anti-South agenda were at the forefront of the opposition against him. Jonathan was subjected to relentless criticism, ridicule, and personal attacks, including public displays of a coffin bearing his image. Supporters of the present administration were not entirely absent from that political hostility.

Similarly, during Muhammadu Buhari's administration, many Northerners openly criticized his government, organized protests, and described his leadership as ineffective and incompetent. Contrary to the impression that the North unanimously supported him, there was considerable dissatisfaction within the region itself. His re-election was not evidence of universal support from the North.

Abraham argues that the more fundamental issue is governance, with Nigerians across different regions expressing frustration over the cost of living, economic conditions, and struggling to meet their basic needs. If the administration had delivered on its promises and significantly improved living conditions, there would be little reason for people to look towards the opposition.

The author commends Nyesom Wike, a presidential appointee, for his performance and contributions to infrastructural developments in Abuja. However, he finds it difficult to identify many other appointees whose performance matches the expectations and promises made to Nigerians. Too many promises have been made, but promises alone cannot put food on people's tables, create jobs, or improve their standard of living.

Ultimately, Nigerians are demanding good governance because they deserve it, not based on the region from which the President comes. The conversation should be about performance, accountability, and the welfare of citizens, not about North versus South. Abraham argues that governments should be judged by what they deliver, not by where the President comes from.

The author concludes that it is misleading to interpret Nigerians' dissatisfaction with the current administration as a northern obsession with retaining political power. Rather, it is a reflection of the people's desire for good governance and improved living conditions. The focus should be on holding the government accountable for its performance and promises, rather than perpetuating regional divisions.

Key points

• Nigerians are frustrated with governance, not geography.