Namibian politics has been criticised for lacking sophistication, with judgements often based on superficial observations rather than in-depth analysis. This approach has resulted in a focus on descriptions of events rather than explanatory depth. The phenomenon is not unique to Namibia, as Africa and black people have historically suffered from such approaches. The emphasis on description over explanation has led to a lack of nuanced understanding in the country's politics.
The issue of description versus explanation has its roots in history. Ancient Greek physician Galen reduced black people to a few characteristics, which were later spread without critique or examination of the sample size. This approach was perpetuated through the exhibition of Sarah Baartman in European halls, showcasing her physical features as a curiosity. The legacy of this descriptive tyranny continues to influence how Africa and its people are perceived and described.
The problem persists in modern times, with African elites often adopting the descriptive tools of their colonisers. Frantz Fanon wrote about this phenomenon in 'The Wretched of the Earth', highlighting how African leaders mimic colonial mannerisms. Achille Mbembe further developed this idea in 'On the Postcolony', describing how African postcolonial states can devolve into regimes of violence characterised by theatrical displays of power.
In Namibia, the eighth parliament has been criticised for shallow discourse and a lack of reflective engagement. The focus on descriptions of events, such as "no law passed" and "walking out", has not been matched with a deeper analysis of the structural and contextual factors at play. This approach has led to a lack of understanding about the complexities of the country's politics.
A key aspect of this issue is the power dynamics at play in the Namibian parliament. The country has a complex history of law-making, with over 1 000 laws passed during colonial rule from 1884 to 1990. In contrast, the post-independence parliament has passed significantly fewer laws, with only three to four laws passed in 2021. The government is currently sitting on over 30 passed laws that have not been brought into force.
The Namibian parliament's approach to law-making and implementation has significant implications for the country's governance. With only six bills currently before the National Assembly, the government's inaction on passed laws has raised concerns about its commitment to effective governance. The Namibia Film Commission Act of 2000, for example, has waited 26 years for implementation.
The issues plaguing Namibia's parliament reflect deeper societal challenges. The country's politics often prioritise style over substance, with a focus on appearances rather than meaningful engagement. To move forward, Namibia's leaders must adopt a more nuanced approach, prioritising explanatory depth over descriptive simplicity. This will require a fundamental shift in how the country's politics operates.
Key points
- Namibian politics often prioritise description over explanation, mirroring a centuries-old trend in Africa.
- The country's parliament has been criticised for shallow discourse and a lack of reflective engagement.
- The government is sitting on over 30 passed laws that have not been brought into force, highlighting a significant implementation gap.
