In a thought-provoking opinion piece, Paul T. Shipale and Folito Nghitongovali Diawara Gaspar argue that Namibia's democracy is vulnerable if institutions fail to serve the nation rather than individual interests. They pose critical questions about the extent to which those in power will go to maintain their positions and the consequences of institutional damage. The authors emphasize that a functioning democracy relies on strong institutions that protect citizens from arbitrary power and ensure accountability.
The authors stress that institutions, not personal virtue, are crucial in holding power accountable. They highlight the importance of an independent judiciary, a free press, and civil society in scrutinizing those in power. In Namibia, as in other African countries, the struggle for political independence did not automatically guarantee liberation from the abuse of power. The authors argue that true sovereignty requires institutions capable of serving citizens, not just personalities.
Shipale and Gaspar warn that a culture of silence can be detrimental to democracy. They argue that loyalty should not be measured by silence, but by courageous criticism when necessary. In a healthy democracy, citizens should feel empowered to challenge those in power without fear of reprisal. The authors emphasize that institutions should serve society, not protect themselves.
The consequences of power struggles and institutional failure are far-reaching, impacting ordinary citizens' daily lives. Young people struggling to find employment, entrepreneurs facing barriers to opportunity, and families waiting for better healthcare services are all affected by governance failures. The authors stress that bad governance eventually becomes a household problem.
The authors draw on Africa's political history to illustrate the dangers of institutional decline. They cite examples of countries where democratic credentials and liberation histories have not guaranteed protection against the abuse of power. Shipale and Gaspar emphasize that history should be respected but not used as a license for impunity.
In a functioning democracy, power is temporary, and institutions must endure. The authors argue that every political leader will eventually confront the reality of their temporary position and the importance of strong institutions. These institutions protect citizens from arbitrary power and ensure accountability, even when governments change.
Ultimately, the authors conclude that Namibia's democracy hinges on the strength of its institutions. They emphasize that citizens have a critical role in demanding answers from those entrusted with public authority and holding them accountable. By doing so, Namibians can ensure that their democracy remains robust and that power serves the nation, not just a select few.
Key points
- A functioning democracy relies on strong institutions that hold power accountable.
- Institutions, not personal virtue, are crucial in protecting citizens from arbitrary power.
- Citizens have a critical role in demanding answers from those entrusted with public authority.
