The defense team of General Bienvenue Lamah has responded to criticism from the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) regarding his acquittal. On September 30, 2026, the lawyers released a statement rejecting the FIDH's claims and denouncing what they described as a "media condemnation" of their client. The FIDH had held a press conference criticizing the acquittal and calling for further investigation.
The lawyers, led by Maîtres Zézé Kalivogui, Pépé Antoine Lama, Murielle Houesse Houindo, and Paul Lazard Gbilimou, argued that continuing to refer to General Lamah as the "main accused" without acknowledging his acquittal is damaging to his reputation. They emphasized that guilt can only be established through a court of law, with the accused having the right to a defense. The team also questioned the FIDH's motives for contesting the acquittal.
The defense team expressed satisfaction with President Alpha Condé's decision to promote General Lamah, highlighting his service to the nation. As the former commander of the Conakry Regional Gendarmerie, they argued that the promotion was a recognition of his dedication and hard work. The lawyers stressed that their client's acquittal should be respected and that contesting it must be done through the proper legal channels.
The lawyers also raised concerns about the compensation of victims in the case. They called for transparency in the management of funds allocated to victims and urged the FIDH to ensure that payments are made fairly and without any irregularities. The team emphasized that the rights of victims to reparations must be respected and that the state must be protected from unjust enrichment.
Furthermore, the defense team questioned the FIDH's silence on the case of a former Minister of Defense who was not prosecuted due to an ordinance of non-prosecution. They wondered why the FIDH was vocal about General Lamah's acquittal but remained silent on the decision not to prosecute the former minister. The lawyers implied that the FIDH's actions may be selective and biased.
The lawyers reminded their colleague, Maître Thierry Breton of the FIDH, of the professional obligations of lawyers, including dignity, moderation, and delicacy. They stressed that no organization can claim a monopoly on the truth or substitute its opinions for court decisions. The defense team reserved the right to take judicial action or file complaints with the relevant professional bodies.
The controversy surrounding General Lamah's acquittal and the FIDH's criticism highlights the complexities of justice and human rights in Guinea. The case has sparked a heated debate about the role of human rights organizations and the independence of the judiciary. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the various parties will navigate the complex issues at stake.
Key points
- The defense team of General Bienvenue Lamah rejects FIDH criticism of his acquittal.
- The lawyers call for transparency in the compensation of victims in the case.
- The controversy highlights the complexities of justice and human rights in Guinea.
