The trial of Aboubacar Camara, president of Guinea's National Chamber of Judicial Officers, and Alhassane Bah, also a judicial officer, concluded on November 4, 2026. The Corruption and Economic Offenses Court (CRIEF) found that the charges against them were not substantiated. Camara and Bah were accused of corruption, breach of trust, and other offenses allegedly committed against the GPMS company, represented by Kabinet Diané.
The two notaries had pleaded not guilty throughout the trial, which was held at the CRIEF's Judgment Chamber. The prosecution, led by Biwon Milimono, requested that the court apply article 544 of the penal code, which would result in the dismissal of the charges due to lack of evidence. The defense team, represented by Antoine Pépé Lama, also argued for their clients' acquittal.
The CRIEF court ultimately ruled in favor of the notaries, declaring them not guilty of the charges brought against them. The court ordered that the decision be published on several news websites, including Guineenews, Guineematin.com, Africaguinee, Guinée 360, and Mediaguinee. This verdict brings an end to a lengthy trial that had significant implications for the two judicial officers.
Camara and Bah were facing serious allegations, including corruption, breach of trust, and involvement in organized crime. However, the court's decision suggests that these allegations could not be substantiated with sufficient evidence. The notaries' acquittal may have significant implications for their careers and reputation.
The case had garnered significant attention in Guinea's legal community, with many following the developments closely. The acquittal may be seen as a positive outcome for the two notaries, who maintained their innocence throughout the trial. However, the details of the case and the court's reasoning behind its decision are not yet fully available.
The CRIEF court's decision is a significant development in Guinea's efforts to combat corruption and ensure accountability in the justice system. While the notaries were cleared of the charges, the case highlights the ongoing challenges in addressing corruption and promoting transparency in the country.
The court's ruling also underscores the importance of upholding the principles of justice and ensuring that allegations are thoroughly investigated before proceeding to trial. In this case, the evidence was deemed insufficient to warrant a conviction, and the notaries were accordingly acquitted.
Key points
- The Guinea court cleared Aboubacar Camara and Alhassane Bah of corruption charges due to lack of evidence.
- The notaries were accused of corruption, breach of trust, and other offenses allegedly committed against GPMS company.
- The court's decision was published on several news websites, including Guineenews and Guineematin.com.
