Former Tamale Central MP Inusah Fuseini has expressed doubts about the necessity of a Consultative or Constituent Assembly for proposed amendments to Ghana's Constitution. Speaking on Channel One TV's The Big Issue on September 19, 2026, Mr. Fuseini stated that the Constitution provides procedures for amendments, with Parliament playing a central role. He believes the New Patriotic Party (NPP) was not advised by constitutional experts on this matter.

According to Mr. Fuseini, the Constitution's amendment procedure does not require a Consultative Assembly. He emphasized that for amendments concerning entrenched provisions, relevant constitutional requirements, including a referendum, must be followed. In such cases, Parliament will serve as a constituent assembly. Mr. Fuseini's comments come as a response to the NPP's call for a Constituent or Consultative Assembly to implement recommendations from the Constitution Review Committee's report.

Mr. Fuseini highlighted that the constitutional provisions governing amendments do not expressly provide for a Consultative Assembly. He noted that if the objective were to formulate an entirely new Constitution, a Consultative Assembly could have a role. In such a scenario, Parliament could be turned into a constituent assembly to receive proposals for a new Constitution.

The debate over the government's response to the Constitution Review Committee's recommendations continues, with discussions on the appropriate constitutional process for implementing proposed reforms. Mr. Fuseini's remarks add to the conversation, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Constitution's amendment procedures.

As a former MP, Mr. Fuseini's insights into Ghana's constitutional processes carry significant weight. His assertion that Parliament can serve as a constituent assembly for amendment purposes underscores the existing mechanisms within the Constitution. This perspective may influence the NPP's approach to implementing the recommended reforms.

The Constitution Review Committee's report contains several proposals for constitutional amendments, which have sparked intense debate across Ghana. The NPP's proposal for a Consultative Assembly has been met with skepticism by some, including Mr. Fuseini, who argue that it is not required by the Constitution.

The discussion on Ghana's constitutional amendments is ongoing, with various stakeholders weighing in on the best approach. As the government considers the recommendations, it will be crucial to balance the need for reform with the imperative of adhering to the Constitution's established procedures.

Key points

  • The NPP's proposal for a Consultative Assembly may not be required by Ghana's Constitution, according to former MP Inusah Fuseini.
  • Parliament can serve as a constituent assembly for amendment purposes, as per the Constitution's existing mechanisms.
  • The debate over constitutional amendments in Ghana continues, with stakeholders discussing the best approach to implement the recommended reforms.

Share this story

Written by

SaharaWire Newsroom
SaharaWire

Reporting for SaharaWire from the Nairobi bureau.